Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192040›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2024

pHoenix score: development and validation of a novel approach to decrease the number of inconclusive GERD diagnoses.

Andrés R Latorre-Rodríguez, Sumeet K Mittal, Hailey Simmonds, Peter Kim, Ross M Bremner

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. pHoenix score discriminative ability in suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease: a high-volume single-center external validation.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrés R Latorre-RodríguezNorton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3401-8623
Sumeet K MittalNorton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA. sumeetkmittal@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2760-3891
Hailey SimmondsSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Peter KimCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix Health Sciences Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ross M BremnerNorton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2216-9109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Johnson-DeMeester composite score (DMS) is the historical gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The Lyon Consensus outlines criteria for diagnosing GERD by pH monitoring, defining normal acid exposure time (AET) as < 4% and pathological as > 6%, presenting diagnostic uncertainty from 4 to 6%. We aimed to (i) calculate the proportion of borderline studies defined by total AET alone that are reclassified as normal or pathological by the DMS, (ii) determine the importance of supine AET for reclassification, and (iii) propose a new classification system using a composite score that considers positional changes.

methodsThis single-center, retrospective, observational study analyzed data from patients with an overall total AET from 2 to 6% on 48-h pH monitoring (Bravo pH capsule). Preselected predictors (supine and upright AET) were included in a model to create a composite score (i.e., pHoenix score) using the regression coefficients. The model was internally validated, and discriminative ability was tested against the DMS and compared to the total AET.

resultsWe identified 114 patients (80 [70.2%] women; median age, 55 years). Using the total AET, 26 (22.8%) were classified as normal and 88 (77.2%) as borderline; however, using the DMS, 45 (39.5%) were classified as normal and 69 (60.5%) as pathological. The new pHoenix score demonstrated strong discriminative ability (AUC: 0.957 [95% CI 0.917, 0.998]) with high sensitivity and specificity (lower threshold, 94.4% and 79.2%; upper threshold, 87 and 95.8%). Compared to the total AET alone, the pHoenix score significantly decreased the proportion of inconclusive cases (77.2% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.001).

conclusionTotal AET has low sensitivity to identify pathological reflux as it disregards supine versus upright reflux. The pHoenix score improves the distinction between normal and pathological cases and reduces ambiguity, offering an alternative approach to diagnosing GERD that addresses the limitations of using total AET alone or the DMS.

Indexed as

Esophageal pH MonitoringGastroesophageal RefluxAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSupine PositionAmbulatory esophageal pH monitoringGastroesophageal refluxGERDPH monitoringReflux

Identifiers

PMID39192040
PMCPMC11525326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.