Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192036›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2024

Third-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase 1/2 study.

Patrick Derigs, Maria-Luisa Schubert, Peter Dreger, Anita Schmitt, Schayan Yousefian, Simon Haas, Caroline Röthemeier, Brigitte Neuber, Angela Hückelhoven-Krauss, Monika Brüggemann and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Depletion of CD8Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancing Immunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Innate immune cells in chimeric antigen receptor therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Patrick DerigsInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Patrick.Derigs@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-8851
Maria-Luisa SchubertInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter DregerInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-8570
Anita SchmittInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Schayan YousefianBerlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-0369
Simon HaasBerlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-2051
Caroline RöthemeierBerlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Brigitte NeuberInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Angela Hückelhoven-KraussInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Monika BrüggemannDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5514-5010
Helga BernhardDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Guido KobbeDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Albrecht LindemannOnkologie in Ettlingen, Ettlingen, Germany.
Mathias RummelDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Birgit MichelsInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix KorellInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anthony D HoInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carsten Müller-TidowInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-5232
Michael SchmittInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-1509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Third-generation chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) for relapsed or refractory (r/r) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may improve efficacy compared to second-generation CARTs due to their enhanced CAR design. We performed the first phase 1/2 investigator-initiated trial evaluating escalating doses of third-generation CARTs (HD-CAR-1) targeting CD19 in patients with r/r CLL and B-cell lymphoma. CLL eligibility criteria were failure to two therapy lines including at least one pathway inhibitor and/or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Nine heavily pretreated patients received HD-CAR-1 at dose levels ranging from 1 × 10

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39192036
PMCPMC11519001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.