Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192001›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2024

Tumour mutational burden: clinical utility, challenges and emerging improvements.

Jan Budczies, Daniel Kazdal, Michael Menzel, Susanne Beck, Klaus Kluck, Christian Altbürger, Constantin Schwab, Michael Allgäuer, Aysel Ahadova, Matthias Kloor and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Revisiting tumor immunogenicity through the lens of mutant p53: Implications for cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  10. Overcoming Drug Resistance by Paclitaxel Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jan Budczies *Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. jan.budczies@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-5327
Daniel Kazdal *Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-3281
Michael MenzelInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-4741
Susanne BeckInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus KluckInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1000-8052
Christian AltbürgerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4545-2719
Constantin SchwabInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael AllgäuerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Aysel AhadovaDepartment of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias KloorDepartment of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Solange PetersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alwin KrämerClinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Petros ChristopoulosTranslational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. albrecht.stenzinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour mutational burden (TMB), defined as the total number of somatic non-synonymous mutations present within the cancer genome, varies across and within cancer types. A first wave of retrospective and prospective research identified TMB as a predictive biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors and culminated in the disease-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for patients with TMB-high tumours based on data from the Keynote-158 trial. Although the applicability of outcomes from this trial to all cancer types and the optimal thresholds for TMB are yet to be ascertained, research into TMB is advancing along three principal avenues: enhancement of TMB assessments through rigorous quality control measures within the laboratory process, including the mitigation of confounding factors such as limited panel scope and low tumour purity; refinement of the traditional TMB framework through the incorporation of innovative concepts such as clonal, persistent or HLA-corrected TMB, tumour neoantigen load and mutational signatures; and integration of TMB with established and emerging biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, immune gene expression profiles and the tumour immune contexture. Given its pivotal functions in both the pathogenesis of cancer and the ability of the immune system to recognize tumours, a profound comprehension of the foundational principles and the continued evolution of TMB are of paramount relevance for the field of oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMutationNeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.