ArticleScientific reports2024
Altered circadian expression of clock genes and clock-regulatory epigenetic modifiers in saliva of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comprehensive integrative analysis of circadian rhythms in human saliva.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prenatal alcohol-exposed (AE) infants and children often demonstrate disrupted sleep patterns, including more frequent awakenings, reduced total sleep time, and more night-to-night sleep variability. Despite the strong connection between sleep patterns and circadian rhythmicity, relatively little is known about circadian rhythm disruptions in individuals with AE. Recently, several reports demonstrated that evaluating the expression patterns of human clock genes in biological fluids could reveal an individual's circadian phenotype. Human saliva offers an emerging and easily available physiological sample that can be collected non-invasively for core-clock gene transcript analyses. We compared the expression patterns of core-clock genes and their regulatory genes in salivary samples of children aged 6-10 years-old with and without AE during the light cycle between ZT0-ZT11. We isolated the RNA from the samples and measured the expression patterns of core clock genes and clock regulating genes using the human specific primers with quantitative real-time PCR. Analysis of core clock genes expression levels in saliva samples from AE children indicates significantly altered levels in expression of core-clock BMAL1, CLOCK, PER1-3 and CRY1,2, as compared to those in age-matched control children. We did not find any sex difference in levels of clock genes in AE and control groups. Cosinor analysis was used to evaluate the rhythmic pattern of these clock genes, which identified circadian patterns in the levels of core clock genes in the control group but absent in the AE group. The gene expression profile of a salivary circadian biomarker ARRB1 was rhythmic in saliva of control children but was arhythmic in AE children. Altered expression patterns were also observed in clock regulatory genes: NPAS2, NFL3, NR1D1, DEC1, DEC2, and DBP, as well as chromatin modifiers: MLL1, P300, SIRT1, EZH2, HDAC3, and ZR1D1, known to maintain rhythmic expression of core-clock genes. Overall, these findings provide the first evidence that AE disturbs the circadian patten expression of core clock genes and clock-regulatory chromatin modifiers in saliva.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.