Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39191905›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Accurate low and high grade glioma classification using free water eliminated diffusion tensor metrics and ensemble machine learning.

Sreejith Vidyadharan, B V V S N Prabhakar Rao, P Yogeeswari, C Kesavadas, Venkateswaran Rajagopalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sreejith VidyadharanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, 500078, India.
B V V S N Prabhakar RaoDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, 500078, India.
P YogeeswariDepartment of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, 500078, India.
C KesavadasDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695011, India.
Venkateswaran RajagopalanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, 500078, India. venkateswaran@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma, a predominant type of brain tumor, can be fatal. This necessitates an early diagnosis and effective treatment strategies. Current diagnosis is based on biopsy, prompting the need for non invasive neuroimaging alternatives. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising method for studying the pathophysiological impact of tumors on white matter (WM) tissue. Single-shell DTI studies in brain glioma patients have not accounted for free water (FW) contamination due to tumors. This study aimed to (a) assess the efficacy of a two-compartment DTI model that accounts for FW contamination and (b) identify DTI-based biomarkers to classify low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. DTI data from 86 patients (LGG n = 39, HGG n = 47) were obtained using a routine clinical imaging protocol. DTI metrics of tumorous regions and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) were evaluated. Advanced stacked-based ensemble learning was employed to classify LGG and HGG patients using both single- and two-compartment DTI model measures. The DTI metrics of the two-compartment model outperformed those of the standard single-compartment DTI model in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) score in classifying LGG and HGG patients. Four features (out of 16 features), namely fractional anisotropy (FA) of the edema and core region and FA and mean diffusivity of the NAWM region, showed superior performance (sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 90%, and AUC-ROC = 90%) in classifying LGG and HGG. This demonstrates that both tumorous and NAWM regions may be differentially affected in LGG and HGG patients. Our results demonstrate the significance of using a two-compartment DTI model that accounts for FW contamination by improving diagnostic accuracy. This improvement may eventually aid in planning treatment strategies for glioma patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingGliomaMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingWaterWhite MatterWaterBrainDiffusion tensor imagingEnsemble learningFree water eliminationHigh-grade gliomaLow-grade gliomaMachine learningMRITwo-compartment DTI modelWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID39191905
PMCPMC11350135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.