ArticleNature communications2024
Comprehensive modeling of corkscrew motion in micro-/nano-robots with general helical structures.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From imaging enhancement to surgical autonomy: the evolutionary role of nanotechnology in AI-driven robotic surgery.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Microrobots for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment in the Digestive System: A Review of Actuation Mechanisms, Structural Design, Preclinical and Translational Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Porous Hybrid Soft Actuators From Liquid Crystal Networks and Lyotropic Chromonic Liquid Crystal Templated Hydrogels.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Kidney angiopoietin-like protein 4 regulates fibrotic responses in diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Modular magnetic microrobot system for robust endoluminal navigation and high-radial force stent delivery in complex ductal anatomy.Science advances · 2025Article
- Application of the adaptive sparrow search algorithm in medical supply engineering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machining swarf formation-inspired fabrication of ferrofluidic helical miniature robots with multimodal locomotion capability.Science advances · 2025Article
- Advances in Magnetically Controlled Medical Robotics: A Review of Actuation Systems, Continuum Designs, and Clinical Prospects for Minimally Invasive Therapies.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micro-/nano-robots (MNRs) have impressive potential in minimally invasive targeted therapeutics through blood vessels, which has disruptive impact to improving human health. However, the clinical use of MNRs has yet to happen due to intrinsic limitations, such as overcoming blood flow. These bottlenecks have not been empirically solved. To tackle them, a full understanding of MNR behaviors is necessary as the first step. The common movement principle of MNRs is corkscrew motion with a helical structure. The existing dynamic model is only applicable to standard helical MNRs. In this paper, we propose a dynamic model for general MNRs without structure limitations. Comprehensive simulations and experiments were conducted, which shows the validity and accuracy of our model. Such a model can serve as a reliable basis for the design, optimization, and control of MNRs and as a powerful tool for gaining fluid dynamic insights, thus accelerating the development of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.