Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39191663›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024

Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a lexical judgment task.

Alexia Dalski, Holly Kular, Julia G Jorgensen, Kalanit Grill-Spector, Mareike Grotheer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Cortical Responses to Multiple Written Words.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Simultaneous cortical responses to multiple written words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexia DalskiDepartment of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, Marburg 35032, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-2078
Holly KularDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9984-1031
Julia G JorgensenDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Kalanit Grill-SpectorDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-9606
Mareike GrotheerDepartment of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, Marburg 35032, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8653-1157

Funding

Functional-neuroanatomy of high-level visual cortex: a quantitative multimodal approachR01EY023915 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kalanit Grill-Spector · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual word form area in the occipitotemporal sulcus (here OTS-words) is crucial for reading and shows a preference for text stimuli. We hypothesized that this text preference may be driven by lexical processing. Hence, we performed three fMRI experiments (n = 15), systematically varying participants' task and stimulus, and separately evaluated middle mOTS-words and posterior pOTS-words. Experiment 1 contrasted text with other visual stimuli to identify both OTS-words subregions. Experiment 2 utilized an fMRI adaptation paradigm, presenting compound words as texts or emojis. In experiment 3, participants performed a lexical or color judgment task on compound words in text or emoji format. In experiment 2, pOTS-words, but not mOTS-words, showed fMRI adaptation for compound words in both formats. In experiment 3, both subregions showed higher responses to compound words in emoji format. Moreover, mOTS-words showed higher responses during the lexical judgment task and a task-stimulus interaction. Multivariate analyses revealed that distributed responses in pOTS-words encode stimulus and distributed responses in mOTS-words encode stimulus and task. Together, our findings suggest that the function of the OTS-words subregions goes beyond the specific visual processing of text and that these regions are flexibly recruited whenever semantic meaning needs to be assigned to visual input.

Indexed as

JudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingReadingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleOccipital LobePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationSemanticsTemporal LobeYoung Adultcategory selectivityoccipitotemporal sulcusreadingvisionvisual word form area

Identifiers

PMID39191663
PMCPMC11349430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.