Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39191493›Full record

ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics

The Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Hereditary Cancer: Experience from a Single Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory.

Nikolaos Tsoulos, Konstantinos Agiannitopoulos, Kevisa Potska, Anastasia Katseli, Christina Ntogka, Georgia Pepe, Dimitra Bouzarelou, Athanasios Papathanasiou, Dimitrios Grigoriadis, Georgios N Tsaousis and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrative sWGS: A New Paradigm for HRD Detection in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Nikolaos TsoulosGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos AgiannitopoulosGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece; kagiannitopoulos@genekor.com.
Kevisa PotskaGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Anastasia KatseliGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Christina NtogkaGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Georgia PepeGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Dimitra BouzarelouGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios PapathanasiouGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios GrigoriadisGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Georgios N TsaousisGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Helen GogasFirst Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens - School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Theodore TroupisSchool of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos PapazisisEuromedica General Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis NatsiopoulosInterbalkan Medical Center of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vassileios VenizelosMetropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Kyriakos AmarantidisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Stylianos GiassasIASO, General Maternity and Gynecology Clinic, Athens, Greece.
Christos PapadimitriouOncology Unit, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Elena FountzilasDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Lukes's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maroulio StathoulopoulouMetropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Anna KoumarianouSection of Medical Oncology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Grigorios XepapadakisIASO, General Maternity and Gynecology Clinic, Athens, Greece.
Alexandru BlidaruSaint Constantin Hospital, Brasov, Romania.
Daniela ZobOncology Department, "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu" Bucharest Oncology Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Oana VoineaDepartment of Pathology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Mustafa ÖzdoğanDivision of Medical Oncology, Memorial Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Mahmut Çerkez ErgörenDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Alinta HegmaneRiga East University Hospital, Oncology Center of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Eirini PapadopoulouGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
George NasioulasGenekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.
Christos MarkopoulosSchool of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the genetic investigation of hereditary cancer is important for clinical surveillance, therapeutic approach, and reducing the risk of developing new malignancies. The aim of the study was to explore genetic predisposition in individuals referred for hereditary cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 8,261 individuals were referred for multigene genetic testing, during the period 2020-2023, in the laboratory, and underwent multigene genetic testing using NGS. Among the examined individuals, 56.17% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 6.77% with ovarian cancer, 2.88% with colorectal cancer, 1.91% with prostate cancer, 6.43% were healthy with a significant family history of cancer, while 3.06% had a different type of cancer and 0.21% had not provided any information. Additionally, in 85 women with breast cancer we performed whole exome sequencing analysis.

results20% of the examined individuals carried a pathogenic variant. Specifically, 54.8% of the patients had a pathogenic variant in a clinically significant gene (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, PMS2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, TP53, MSH6, APC, RAD51D, PTEN, RET, CDH1, MEN1, and VHL). Among the different types of pathogenic variants detected, a significant percentage (6.52%) represented copy number variation (CNV). With WES analysis, the following findings were detected: CTC1: c.880C>T, p.(Gln294*); MLH3: c.405del, p.(Asp136Metfs*2), PPM1D: c.1426_1430del, p.(Glu476Leufs*3), and SDHB: c.395A>G, p.(His132Arg).

conclusionComprehensive multigene genetic testing is necessary for appropriate clinical management of pathogenic variants' carriers. Additionally, the information obtained is important for determining the risk of malignancy development in family members of the examined individuals.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLaboratories, ClinicalMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorHereditary cancernext generation sequencingwhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39191493
PMCPMC11363926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.