Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39191445›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Genomic landscape of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals multiple targetable opportunities.

Laura H Rosenberger, Richard F Riedel, Emilia J Diego, Amanda L Nash, Juneko E Grilley-Olson, Natalie A Danziger, Ethan S Sokol, Jeffrey S Ross, Sarah L Sammons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a comprehensive review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura H RosenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6829-6747
Richard F RiedelDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-8710
Emilia J DiegoDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Amanda L NashDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Juneko E Grilley-OlsonDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Natalie A DanzigerFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02141, United States.
Ethan S SokolFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02141, United States.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02141, United States.
Sarah L SammonsMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant phyllodes tumors (MPT) are rare fibroepithelial breast cancers with no known effective systemic therapy; metastatic progression portends a dismal prognosis. We sought to describe the genomic landscape of MPTs through genomic profiling and immunotherapeutic biomarker analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsCases of sequenced MPT were identified from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified, College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory (Foundation Medicine). All cases underwent genomic profiling using adaptor ligation-based, next-generation sequencing assay of 324 genes. Tumor agnostic immunotherapy biomarkers, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were evaluated. Fisher's Exact Tests and analysis of variance were used to test for differences between groups and for continuous variables as appropriate.

resultsOf 135 MPT cases identified; 94 (69.6%) were localized/locally recurrent and 41 (30.4%) were metastatic. Median age was 54 years (range 14-86). The median TMB was 2.5 mut/Mb and 3 were TMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb). 21.4% were PD-L1+ via Dako 22C3 assay (CPS ≥1). Most commonly altered genes included TERT-promoter (69.7%), CDKN2A (45.9%), TP53 (37.8%), NF1 (35.6%), CDKN2B (33.3%), MED12 (28.9%), MTAP (27.7%), KMT2D (22.2%), PIK3CA (20.0%), PTEN (18.5%), and RB1 (18.5%). Several tumors harboring genomic alterations with US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications in other tumor types were found including NF1, PIK3CA, EGFR Exon 19/20 insertions, and BRAF V600E mutations.

conclusionsIn the largest genomic evaluation of MPT to date, multiple clinically actionable mutations were found. Routine sequencing of metastatic MPT may provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPhyllodes TumorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeurofibromin 1Young AdultBiomarkers, TumorNeurofibromin 1genomic mutationgenomic sequencingmalignant phyllodesphyllodes tumortargeted therapyTERT promoter

Identifiers

PMID39191445
PMCPMC11630793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.