ArticleThe oncologist2024
Genomic landscape of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals multiple targetable opportunities.
Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landscape of genetic alterations affecting cancer genes in primary and advanced malignant phyllodes tumours.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Management of Breast Phyllodes Tumors: A Grade-Stratified Surgical and Reconstructive Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular pathology of phyllodes tumours of the breast-much more than MED12.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a comprehensive review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) is Reliably Detected in Patients with Metastatic Malignant Phyllodes Tumors, a Feasibility Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Contemporary management of phyllodes tumours of the breast: recommendations from the UK Association of Breast Surgery.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Malignant Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Review
- The pathologic and genomic evolution of primary malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective cohort study and case-control genomic analysis.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Unexpected outcomes of tislelizumab treatment in thoracic metastasis of malignant phyllodes tumors: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Case report: Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for high tumour mutational burden malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast as revealed by comprehensive genomic profiling.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant phyllodes tumors (MPT) are rare fibroepithelial breast cancers with no known effective systemic therapy; metastatic progression portends a dismal prognosis. We sought to describe the genomic landscape of MPTs through genomic profiling and immunotherapeutic biomarker analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsCases of sequenced MPT were identified from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified, College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory (Foundation Medicine). All cases underwent genomic profiling using adaptor ligation-based, next-generation sequencing assay of 324 genes. Tumor agnostic immunotherapy biomarkers, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were evaluated. Fisher's Exact Tests and analysis of variance were used to test for differences between groups and for continuous variables as appropriate.
resultsOf 135 MPT cases identified; 94 (69.6%) were localized/locally recurrent and 41 (30.4%) were metastatic. Median age was 54 years (range 14-86). The median TMB was 2.5 mut/Mb and 3 were TMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb). 21.4% were PD-L1+ via Dako 22C3 assay (CPS ≥1). Most commonly altered genes included TERT-promoter (69.7%), CDKN2A (45.9%), TP53 (37.8%), NF1 (35.6%), CDKN2B (33.3%), MED12 (28.9%), MTAP (27.7%), KMT2D (22.2%), PIK3CA (20.0%), PTEN (18.5%), and RB1 (18.5%). Several tumors harboring genomic alterations with US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications in other tumor types were found including NF1, PIK3CA, EGFR Exon 19/20 insertions, and BRAF V600E mutations.
conclusionsIn the largest genomic evaluation of MPT to date, multiple clinically actionable mutations were found. Routine sequencing of metastatic MPT may provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.