ArticleNeuroendocrinology2025
Longitudinal Changes in Ki-67 Indices in Small-Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours and Their Impact on Survival.
Article in Neuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining hotspot for estimation of Ki-67 proliferation index of neuroendocrine tumors: QuPath algorithm vs. manual assessment.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Special Issue Advancements and Challenges in Neuroendocrine Tumor Research.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and Health Impacts of Neuroendocrine Tumours.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Costs of Cancer Care for Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate longitudinal changes in Ki-67 indices of SI-NETs and assess the impact of these in overall survival (OS).
methodsWe screened 551 patients with SI-NETs diagnosed from 1993, through 2021, identified using the SI-NET databases from five European referral centres. Only patients with well-differentiated tumours and available baseline tumour samples and follow-up re-biopsies were included. For tumour grading, apart from 2017 WHO classification system, we applied a recently proposed SI-NET site-specific modified histopathological grading system with Ki-67 cut-offs of 5 and 10%. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine whether there was a difference between OS in SI-NET patients stratified by increment of Ki-67 indices over time and/or progression to a higher grade.
resultsWe included 45 patients. Median Ki-67 index at SI-NET diagnosis was 2% (range: 0.5-15%). Thirty-three patients had Ki-67 indices <5% (70.2%), 6 had Ki-67: 5-10% (12.8%), and 8 had Ki-67 ≥10% (17%). Mean time to re-biopsy was 48.8 months (SD: ±162.5). At re-biopsy, the median change in Ki-67 index (absolute value; follow-up minus time of diagnosis) was 1% (range: -10 to +38%). An increase in Ki-67 occurred in 20 patients (42.6%); in 14 patients, the change in Ki-67 resulted in progression to higher tumour grade following the modified grading system. Patients with an increment in Ki-67 ≥1% had a median OS of 32.9 months versus 80.5 months in patients without (HR = 5.6, 95% CI: 1.42-22.02; p = 0.014). When applying the novel modified histopathological grading system for SI-NETs, patients with grade progression had a median OS of 32.9 months versus 53.7 months in those without (HR = 4.61, 95% CI: 1.22-13.54; p = 0.022). At multivariable analysis, grade progression was confirmed as an independent predictor for death (HR = 7.2, 95% CI: 1.58-32.82; p = 0.011).
conclusionsMetachronous increment in Ki-67 indices and related grade progression over time following a site-specific modified histopathological grading system with Ki-67 cut-offs of 5 and 10% is observed in approximately 1/3 of SI-NETs subjected to re-biopsy and it is associated with worse survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.