ArticleEBioMedicine2024
Testing for a causal role of thyroid hormone measurements within the normal range on human metabolism and diseases: a systematic Mendelian randomization.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thyroid dysfunction and cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Noninvasive markers for warning premature ovarian insufficiency: a Mendelian randomisation study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVariation in thyroid function parameters within the normal range has been observationally associated with adverse health outcomes. Whether those associations reflect causal effects is largely unknown.
methodsWe systematically tested associations between genetic differences in thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) within the normal range and more than 1100 diseases and more than 6000 molecular traits (metabolites and proteins) in three large population-based cohorts. This was performed by combining individual and summary level genetic data and using polygenic scores and Mendelian randomization (MR) methods. We performed a phenome-wide MR study in the OpenGWAS database covering thousands of complex phenotypes and diseases.
findingsGenetically predicted TSH or FT4 levels within the normal range were predominately associated with thyroid-related outcomes, like goitre. The few extra-thyroidal outcomes that were found to be associated with genetic liability towards high but normal TSH levels included atrial fibrillation (odds ratio = 0.92, p-value = 2.13 × 10
interpretationIn contrast to previous studies that have described the association with thyroid hormone levels and disease outcomes, our genetic approach finds little evidence of an association between genetic differences in thyroid function within the normal range and non-thyroidal phenotypes. The association described in previous studies may be explained by reverse causation and confounding.
fundingThis research was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (P1BEP3_200041). The Fenland study (DOI 10.22025/2017.10.101.00001) is funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/1, MC_PC_13046 and MC_UU_00006/1). The EPIC-Norfolk study (DOI 10.22025/2019.10.105.00004) has received funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/N003284/1, MC-UU_12015/1, MC_PC_13048 and MC_UU_00006/1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.