Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190917›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Everyday Uses of Music Listening and Music Technologies by Caregivers and People With Dementia: Survey and Focus Group Study.

Dianna Vidas, Romina Carrasco, Ryan M Kelly, Jenny Waycott, Jeanette Tamplin, Kate McMahon, Libby M Flynn, Phoebe A Stretton-Smith, Tanara Vieira Sousa, Felicity A Baker

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dianna VidasSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0574-5610
Romina CarrascoSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-2883
Ryan M KellySchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-6656
Jenny WaycottSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4634-0532
Jeanette TamplinFaculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3623-033X
Kate McMahonFaculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-5736
Libby M FlynnFaculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-3431-7687
Phoebe A Stretton-SmithFaculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4463-1181
Tanara Vieira SousaFaculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-5077
Felicity A BakerFaculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-4467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusic has long been identified as a nonpharmacological tool that can provide benefits for people with dementia, and there is considerable interest in designing technologies to support the use of music in dementia care. However, to ensure that music technologies are appropriately designed for supporting caregivers and people living with dementia, there remains a need to better understand how music is currently used in everyday dementia care at home.

objectiveThis study aims to understand how people living with dementia and their caregivers use music and music technologies in everyday caring, as well as the challenges they experience using music and technology.

methodsThis study used a mixed methods design. First, a survey was administered to 13 people living with dementia and 64 caregivers to understand their use of music and technology. Subsequently, 18 survey respondents (family caregivers: n=12, 67%; people living with dementia: n=6, 33%) participated in focus groups regarding their experiences of using music and technology in care. Interview transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsMost of the survey respondents (people living with dementia: 9/13, 69%; family caregivers: 47/63, 75%) reported using music often or very often in their daily lives. Participants reported a range of technologies used for listening to music, such as CDs, radio, and streaming services. Focus groups highlighted the benefits and challenges of using music and music technologies in everyday care. Participants identified using music and music technologies to regulate mood, provide joy, facilitate social interaction and connection, encourage reminiscence, provide continuity of music use before and after the dementia diagnosis, and make caregiving easier. The challenges of using music technology in everyday caring included difficulties with staying up to date with evolving technology and low self-efficacy with technology for people living with dementia.

conclusionsThis study shows that people with a dementia diagnosis and their caregivers already use music and music technologies to support their everyday care needs. The results suggest opportunities to design technologies that enable easier access to music and to support people living with dementia with recreational and therapeutic music listening as well as music-based activities.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaFocus GroupsMusicAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusic TherapySurveys and Questionnairesdementiadementia caremobile phonemusic technologytechnology

Identifiers

PMID39190917
PMCPMC11387911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.