Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190835›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2024

Short-latency afferent inhibition is reduced with cold-water immersion of a limb and remains reduced after removal from the cold stimulus.

Eden T Delahunty, Leanne M Bisset, Justin J Kavanagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eden T DelahuntyMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-8991
Leanne M BissetMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8807-7093
Justin J KavanaghMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-260X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of pain that is induced by extremely cold temperatures can exert a modulatory effect on motor cortex circuitry. Although it is known that immersion of a single limb in very cold water can increase corticomotor excitability it is unknown how afferent input to the cortex shapes excitatory and inhibitory processes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine motor-evoked potentials (MEP), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and long-latency afferent inhibition (LAI) in response to immersion of a single hand in cold water. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess MEPs, and peripheral nerve stimulation of the median nerve paired with TMS was used to measure SAI and LAI in motor circuits of the ipsilateral hemisphere. Measurements were obtained from electromyography (EMG) of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) at baseline, during cold-water immersion, and during recovery from cold-water immersion. The intervention caused unconditioned MEPs to increase during exposure to the cold stimulus (P = 0.008) which then returned to baseline levels once the hand was removed from the cold water. MEP responses were decoupled from SAI responses, where SAI was reduced during exposure to the cold stimulus (P = 0.005) and remained reduced compared to baseline when the hand was removed from the cold water (P = 0.002). The intervention had no effect on LAI. The uncoupling of SAI from MEPs during the recovery period suggests that the mechanisms underlying the modulation of corticospinal excitability by sensory input may be distinct from those affecting intracortical inhibitory circuits. HIGHLIGHTS: What is the central question of this study? Does immersion of a limb in very cold water influence corticospinal excitability and the level of afferent inhibition exerted on motor cortical circuits? What is the main finding and its importance? In additional to perception of temperature, immersion in 6°C water also induced perceptions of pain. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude increased during immersion, and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) of the motor cortex was reduced during immersion; however, these responses differed after the limb was removed from the cold stimulus, as MEPs returned to normal levels while SAI remained suppressed.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAfferent PathwaysFemaleHandHumansImmersionMaleMedian NerveNeural InhibitionWaterYoung AdultWaterafferent inhibitioncold water immersiontranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39190835
PMCPMC11522815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.