Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190768›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Gender discrimination in Swedish family courts: A quantitative vignette study.

Leonard Ngaosuvan, Jenny Hagberg, Sverker Sikström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonard NgaosuvanDepartment of Culture and Society (IKOS), Division of Social Work (SOCARB), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jenny HagbergDepartment of psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sverker SikströmDepartment of psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2644-9626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender discrimination of women is often emphasized in work contexts, whereas less focus is on how men are discriminated against in social relationships. Gender discrimination in decisions of family relations, is essential to study as the contact between parent and child is commonly viewed as the most important relationship in people's life, as well as being the most important aspect of our life. Following separations, decisions on custody disputes are made by social workers. The purpose of this paper is to study gender discrimination in such decisions.

methodParticipants were instructed to give a recommendation of shared parenting based on a custody case vinjett, where we manipulate the gender of the risk parent.

resultsThe participants' recommendation of living was mainly dependent on the risk parent's gender, where the mother was considerably more likely to receive shared custody than the father.

conclusionsProfessional social workers show selective gender discrimination against fathers in terms of living recommendations.

Indexed as

SexismAdultChild CustodyFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentingSweden

Identifiers

PMID39190768
PMCPMC11349174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.