Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190749›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Reaching adolescents with health services: Systematic development of an adolescent health check-ups and wellbeing programme in Ghana (Y-Check, Ghana).

Benedict Weobong, Franklin N Glozah, Hannah B Taylor-Abdulai, Eric Koka, Nancy Addae, Stanley Alor, Kid Kohl, Prerna Banati, Philip B Adongo, David A Ross

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benedict WeobongSchool of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-1408
Franklin N GlozahSchool of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Hannah B Taylor-AbdulaiDepartment of Physician Assistant Studies, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Eric KokaDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Nancy AddaeDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Stanley AlorSchool of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Kid KohlTechnical Advice and Partnerships Department, The Global Fund, Geneva, Switzerland.
Prerna BanatiAdolescent and Young Adult Health Unit, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philip B AdongoSchool of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.
David A RossInstitute for Lifecourse Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine health check-ups may improve adolescent health, but global guidelines are lacking. Phase 1 of the WHO-coordinated Y-Check Research Programme involved three African cities to co-produce a programme of adolescent health check-ups. We describe a systematic approach to developing a routine adolescent health check-ups and wellbeing programme (Y-Check) to contribute evidence on whether adolescent health check-ups should be part of routine health services in Ghana.

methodsY-Check Phase 1 was conducted in four communities in Cape Coast Ghana, over two stages using a variety of methods: (a) needs assessment and landscape analysis on the health of adolescents (existing policies/programmes, school system, adolescent health conditions) was conducted through desk-review and interviews with key informants to identify the potential content, delivery strategy and settings for adolescent health check-ups in this context; (b) co-designing the Y-Check intervention framework through person-centred participatory workshops and a consensus-building workshop with multiple stakeholders, including adolescents (10-19 years) and their parents. The study was conducted between January 2020 and October 2020.

resultsThe Y-Check intervention consists of two check-ups with content that is tailored to the needs of younger adolescents and older adolescents; delivered at both school and community settings by a team of trained staff in multiple steps involving up to four stations. Y-Check includes a referral system for adolescents with any problems that cannot be investigated or treated on-the-spot.

conclusionsOur systematic approach to co-producing Y-Check has resulted in an intervention whose content and structure is determined by the local context, and which was adjudged by multiple stakeholders to be likely to be both useful and acceptable, and which builds on best practice. As a logical next step, the Y-Check will be subjected to pilot testing and implementation research to rigorously evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, coverage, yield of previously undiagnosed conditions and cost of these health check-ups.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesChildFemaleGhanaHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39190749
PMCPMC11349232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.