ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography
Impact of Emerging Deep Learning-Based MR Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Abdominal MRI Radiomic Features.
Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based high-resolution united compressed sensing for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Assessment of Robustness of MRI Radiomic Features in the Abdomen: Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction and Accelerated Acquisition.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Utility of Thin-slice Single-shot T2-weighted MR Imaging with Deep Learning Reconstruction as a Protocol for Evaluating Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate, on one MRI vendor's platform, the impact of deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction techniques on MRI radiomic features compared to conventional image reconstruction techniques.
methodsUnder IRB approval and informed consent, we prospectively collected undersampled coronal T2-weighted MR images of the abdomen (1.5 T; Philips Healthcare) from 17 pediatric and adult subjects and reconstructed them using a conventional image reconstruction technique (compressed sensitivity encoding [C-SENSE]) and two DL-based reconstruction techniques (SmartSpeed [Philips Healthcare, US FDA cleared] and SmartSpeed with Super Resolution [SmartSpeed-SuperRes, not US FDA cleared to date]). Eight regions of interest (ROIs) across organs/tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, fat, and muscle) were manually placed. Eighty-six MRI radiomic features were then extracted. Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCCs) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated between (A) C-SENSE versus SmartSpeed, and (B) C-SENSE versus SmartSpeed-SuperRes. To quantify the impact from the perspective of the whole MR image, cross-ROI mean PCCs and ICCs were calculated for individual radiomic features. The impact of image reconstruction on individual radiomic features in different organs/tissues was evaluated using ANOVA analyses.
resultsAccording to cross-ROI mean PCCs, 50 out of 86 radiomic features were highly correlated (PCC, ≥0.8) between SmartSpeed and C-SENSE, whereas only 15 radiomic features were highly correlated between SmartSpeed-SuperRes and C-SENSE reconstructions. According to cross-ROI mean ICCs, 58 out of 86 radiomic features had high agreements (ICC ≥0.75) between SmartSpeed and C-SENSE, whereas only 9 radiomic features had high agreements between SmartSpeed-SuperRes and C-SENSE reconstructions. For SmartSpeed reconstruction, the psoas muscle ROI appeared to be impacted most with the lowest median (IQR) correlation of 0.57 (0.25). The circular liver ROI was impacted most by SmartSpeed-SuperRes (PCC, 0.60 [0.22]). ANOVA analyses suggest that the impact of DL reconstruction algorithms on radiomic features varies significantly among different organs/tissues ( P < 0.001).
conclusionsMRI radiomic features are significantly altered by DL-based reconstruction compared to a conventional reconstruction technique. The impact of DL reconstruction algorithms on radiomic features varies significantly between different organs/tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.