ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Cardiac Findings Following Cerebrovascular Disease.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional brain-heart interactions in health and disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Enhancing prognostic accuracy in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: a machine learning approach.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- The role of L-DOPA in neurological and neurodegenerative complications: a review.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Risk analysis of tooth extraction in hypertensive patients under ECG monitoring: a single-center retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Sex-related cardiac complications and their association on functional outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that cardiac findings after stroke are an important, yet understudied, manifestation of brain-heart interactions. Our aim was to investigate and compare cardiac findings after different cerebrovascular events (acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and hemorrhagic stroke). METHODS AND
resultsThere were 7113 patients screened who were treated between December 2013 and December 2020 at the University Hospital Zurich for ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and hemorrhagic stroke. Seven hundred twenty-one patients without evidence of previous cardiac disease or presumed cardioembolic origin of their cerebrovascular disease and with at least 1 cardiac checkup were included. Clinical reports from the year following disease onset were screened for new cardiac findings, which were categorized as arrhythmia/electrocardiographic changes, myocardial alterations, valvular abnormalities, and coronary perfusion insufficiency. Differences in proportions of findings among groups were analyzed using the Pearson χ
conclusionsCardiac findings are frequent in patients with cerebrovascular disease, even without prior cardiac problems or suspected cardiac cause. Similarities, especially between patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, were observed. Our data suggest that all patients with acute cerebrovascular events should receive thorough workup searching for cardiac manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.