ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2024
The Unintended Consequences of Telehealth in Australia: Critical Interpretive Synthesis.
Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07299201 (Evaluation of the Efficiency of Proactive Telemedicine vs Face-to-Face Visits for Universal Access and Health Prevention in a Rural Primary Care Team), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Proactive Telemedicine vs Face-to-Face Visits for Universal Access and Health Prevention in a Rural Primary Care Team: Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The SINFONIA Study: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Feasibility and Effectiveness of Online Group Singing for People With COPD or ILD and Breathlessness.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Trial
- Addressing the How of Implementation: A Hermeneutic Exploration of Implementing Virtual Kidney Care in a Remote, Rural Health Region.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Multidevice Telemonitoring Program for Home-Based Nursing Care in Quebec: Qualitative Report.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Virtual Care and Compassion for Migrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Review
- Telemedicine Adoption for Managing Chronic and Rare Diseases in Indonesia During and Beyond the COVID-19 Era: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Telehealth adoption and use intentions among neurologists in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Negotiating privacy and responsibility in digital public health: a qualitative study of the social and ethical implications of peer-to-peer health data sharing.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Conceptualising the impact of telehealth on rural workforce sustainability using system dynamics and the Gartner Hype Cycle.npj health systems · 2025Article
- International Delphi study on terminology, organisation and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- A Design Framework for Microintervention Software Technology in Digital Health: Critical Interpretive Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Outpatient Virtual Care Among People Living With and Beyond Cancer From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds in Australia: A Protocol for a Realist Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Article
- Medical Policy Reform in the Digital Age: Responding to Health Crises Shaped by Internet Public Opinion.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
- The user experiences of AI-based clinical decision support systems and implications for usage over time: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite more than 2 decades of telehealth use in Australia and the rapid uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic, little is known about its unintended consequences beyond its planned and intended outcomes.
objectiveThe aim of this review was to synthesize evidence on the unintended consequences of telehealth use in Australia to clarify its impact beyond its planned and intended outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a search of 4 electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, and Scopus. A critical interpretive synthesis approach was adopted for its flexibility and interpretive nature. We extracted data about study characteristics and the types and models of telehealth services. The extracted unintended consequences were coded and mapped into the domains and dimensions of the Australian Health Performance Framework.
resultsOf the 4241 records identified by the search, 94 (2.22%) studies were eligible for data extraction and analysis. Of these 94 studies, 23 (24%) reported largely positive unintended consequences of telehealth associated with health status, while 6 (6%) noted a potential negative impact of telehealth on socioeconomic status. The findings of 4 (4%) of the 94 studies highlighted societal and financial consequences of telehealth beyond the health system. Almost all studies (93/94, 99%) reported unintended consequences under the 5 dimensions of the Australian Health Performance Framework.
conclusionsOur synthesis offers a framework for understanding the unintended consequences of the use of telehealth as an alternative to in-person care in Australia. While we have documented many unintended benefits of telehealth use, our findings also shed light on many challenges of delivering care via telehealth across different domains and dimensions. These findings hold significant practice and policy-making implications for ensuring safe and high-quality care delivery via telehealth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.