ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Nonreciprocal synchronization in embryonic oscillator ensembles.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time after time - circadian clocks through the lens of oscillator theory.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- Modes of Notch signalling in development and disease.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synchronization of coupled oscillators is a universal phenomenon encountered across different scales and contexts, e.g., chemical wave patterns, superconductors, and the unison applause we witness in concert halls. The existence of common underlying coupling rules defines universality classes, revealing a fundamental sameness between seemingly distinct systems. Identifying rules of synchronization in any particular setting is hence of paramount relevance. Here, we address the coupling rules within an embryonic oscillator ensemble linked to vertebrate embryo body axis segmentation. In vertebrates, the periodic segmentation of the body axis involves synchronized signaling oscillations in cells within the presomitic mesoderm (PSM), from which somites, the prevertebrae, form. At the molecular level, it is known that intact Notch-signaling and cell-to-cell contact are required for synchronization between PSM cells. However, an understanding of the coupling rules is still lacking. To identify these, we develop an experimental assay that enables direct quantification of synchronization dynamics within mixtures of oscillating cell ensembles, for which the initial input frequency and phase distribution are known. Our results reveal a "winner-takes-it-all" synchronization outcome, i.e., the emerging collective rhythm matches one of the input rhythms. Using a combination of theory and experimental validation, we develop a coupling model, the "Rectified Kuramoto" (ReKu) model, characterized by a phase-dependent, nonreciprocal interaction in the coupling of oscillatory cells. Such nonreciprocal synchronization rules reveal fundamental similarities between embryonic oscillators and a class of collective behaviors seen in neurons and fireflies, where higher-level computations are performed and linked to nonreciprocal synchronization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.