Electronic Alert Systems for Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: The acute kidney injury (AKI) electronic alert (e-alert) system was hypothesized to improve the outcomes of AKI. However, its association with different patient outcomes and clinical practice patterns remains systematically unexplored. Objective: To assess the association of AKI e-alerts with patient outcomes (mortality, AKI progression, dialysis, and kidney recovery) and clinical practice patterns. Data Sources: A search of Embase and PubMed on March 18, 2024, and a search of the Cochrane Library on March 20, 2024, to identify all relevant studies. There were no limitations on language or article types. Study Selection: Studies evaluating the specified outcomes in adult patients with AKI comparing AKI e-alerts with standard care or no e-alerts were included. Studies were excluded if they were duplicate cohorts, had insufficient outcome data, or had no control group. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed bias. The systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects model meta-analysis, with predefined subgroup analysis and trial sequential analyses, were conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included mortality, AKI progression, dialysis, and kidney recovery. Secondary outcomes were nephrologist consultations, post-AKI exposure to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), post-AKI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescription, hospital length of stay, costs, and AKI documentation. Results: Thirteen unique studies with 41 837 unique patients were included (mean age range, 60.5-79.0 years]; 29.3%-48.5% female). The risk ratios (RRs) for the AKI e-alerts group compared with standard care were 0.96 for mortality (95% CI, 0.89-1.03), 0.91 for AKI stage progression (95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 1.16 for dialysis (95% CI, 1.05-1.28), and 1.13 for kidney recovery (95% CI, 0.86-1.49). The AKI e-alerts group had RRs of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.04-2.02) for nephrologist consultation, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.95) for post-AKI NSAID exposure. The pooled RR for post-AKI ACEI/ARB exposure in the AKI e-alerts group compared with the control group was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-1.06) and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.04-1.58) for AKI documentation. Use of AKI e-alerts was not associated with lower hospital length of stay (mean difference, -0.09 [95% CI, -0.47 to 0.30] days) or lower cost (mean difference, US $655.26 [95% CI, -$656.98 to $1967.5]) but was associated with greater AKI documentation (RR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.04-1.58]). Trial sequential analysis confirmed true-positive results of AKI e-alerts on increased nephrologist consultations and reduced post-AKI NSAID exposure and its lack of association with mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, AKI e-alerts were not associated with a lower risk for mortality but were associated with changes in clinical practices. They were associated with lower risk for AKI progression. Further research is needed to confirm these results and integrate early AKI markers or prediction models to improve outcomes.