ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2024
Machine learning approach for the prediction of macrosomia.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and management of fetal growth disorders: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-based machine learning models for assisting the prediction of neonatal size and mode of delivery.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal macrosomia is associated with maternal and newborn complications due to incorrect fetal weight estimation or inappropriate choice of delivery models. The early screening and evaluation of macrosomia in the third trimester can improve delivery outcomes and reduce complications. However, traditional clinical and ultrasound examinations face difficulties in obtaining accurate fetal measurements during the third trimester of pregnancy. This study aims to develop a comprehensive predictive model for detecting macrosomia using machine learning (ML) algorithms. The accuracy of macrosomia prediction using logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, random forest (RF), XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms was explored. Each approach was trained and validated using data from 3244 pregnant women at a hospital in southern China. The information gain method was employed to identify deterministic features associated with the occurrence of macrosomia. The performance of six ML algorithms based on the recall and area under the curve evaluation metrics were compared. To develop an efficient prediction model, two sets of experiments based on ultrasound examination records within 1-7 days and 8-14 days prior to delivery were conducted. The ensemble model, comprising the RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms, showed encouraging results. For each experimental group, the proposed ensemble model outperformed other ML approaches and the traditional Hadlock formula. The experimental results indicate that, with the most risk-relevant features, the ML algorithms presented in this study can predict macrosomia and assist obstetricians in selecting more appropriate delivery models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.