Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190231›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening among high-risk women: a qualitative study.

Claire C Conley, Alaina Anderson, Jennifer D Rodriguez, Hannah Kang, Emily P Taylor, Conor Luck, Jacqueline Rosas Torres, Nora Cheraghi, Noelle Newton, Bethany L Niell and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claire C ConleyDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. claire.conley@georgetown.edu.
Alaina AndersonDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Jennifer D RodriguezDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Hannah KangDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Emily P TaylorDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Conor LuckDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Jacqueline Rosas TorresDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Nora CheraghiDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Noelle NewtonDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Bethany L NiellDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Suzanne C O'NeillDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Susan T VadaparampilHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
The FYI on MRI: A Multilevel Decision Support Intervention for Screening Breast MRIK08CA270402 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Claire C Conley · 2023 to 2026
$777k
Breast Cancer Research Foundation ASPO-19-002NCI NIH HHS K08 CA270402NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen with greater than 20-25% lifetime breast cancer risk are recommended to have breast cancer screening with annual mammogram and supplemental breast MRI. However, few women follow these screening recommendations. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators of screening among women at high risk for breast cancer, guided by the Health Services Utilization Model (HSUM).

methodsUnaffected high-risk women (N=63) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring their experiences with breast cancer screening. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a combined deductive and inductive approach.

resultsMost participants (84%) had received a screening mammogram; fewer (33%) had received a screening breast MRI. Only 14% had received neither screening. In line with the HSUM, qualitative analysis identified predisposing factors, enabling factors, and need factors associated with receipt of breast cancer screening. Enabling factors - including financial burden, logistic barriers, social support, and care coordination - were most frequently discussed. Predisposing factors included knowledge, health beliefs, and self-advocacy. Need factors included healthcare provider recommendation, family history of breast cancer, and personal medical history. Although HSUM themes were consistent for both mammography and breast MRI, participants did highlight several important differences in barriers and facilitators between the two screening modalities.

conclusionBarriers and enabling factors associated with supplemental screening for high-risk women represent possible intervention targets. Future research is needed to develop and test multilevel interventions targeting these factors, with the ultimate goal of increasing access to supplemental screening for high-risk women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsBreast cancerBreast MRICancer riskHealth services utilization modelMammogramScreening

Identifiers

PMID39190231
PMCPMC11786993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.