Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190216›Full record

Trial reportJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home-based Virtual Rehabilitation to Improve Adherence to Prescribed Home Therapy After Burn Injury: A Northwest Regional Burn Model System Trial.

Stephen H Sibbett, Gretchen J Carrougher, Caitlin M Orton, Jody I Sabel, Tonya Terken, Andrew Humbert, Aaron Bunnell, Nicole S Gibran, Tam N Pham, Barclay T Stewart

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephen H SibbettDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3065-9143
Gretchen J CarrougherDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1438-7483
Caitlin M OrtonDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3405-6064
Jody I SabelDepartment of Burn Therapy, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9990-9382
Tonya TerkenDepartment of Burn Therapy, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Andrew HumbertDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-2780
Aaron BunnellDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-1231
Nicole S GibranDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4697-0988
Tam N PhamDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-7745
Barclay T StewartDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8099-9218

Funding

ACL HHSACL HHS 90DPBU0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily rehabilitation after burn injury is vital for the prevention of function-limiting contractures. However, adherence to prescribed therapy following acute burn hospitalization has historically been low and not well-studied. Studies involving virtual reality technology have demonstrated an association with improved functional outcomes in burn therapy. We conducted a 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing 12 weeks of a home-based virtual rehabilitation (HBVR) system with standard burn therapy. Our primary outcome was adherence to prescribed home therapy, measured by e-diary self-report. Secondary outcomes included steps walked daily and patient-reported outcomes regarding stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility. We enrolled 50 subjects, of which 48 provided data for analysis (23 HBVR, 25 control). Overall adherence to prescribed home therapy was low, 37.2% in the HBVR group and 60.0% in the control group. Reasons for nonadherence in the HBVR group included lack of time, engagement, and replacement of therapy with other physical activity. However, some subjects enjoyed HBVR and believed it aided their recovery. There was no difference in daily steps walked between the 2 groups. Daily walking gradually improved from 3500 steps per day in the first week after baseline and plateaued at 6000 steps per day at week 5. There were no differences in stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility between the 2 groups at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Subjects demonstrated improved upper extremity function and mobility in the first year after discharge, which coincided with increasing stiffness.

Indexed as

BurnsHome Care ServicesPatient ComplianceVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiesadherenceburnsexerciserehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39190216
PMCPMC13031110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.