Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190202›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2024

Sulphidogenic Bioprocesses for Acid Mine Water Treatment and Selective Recovery of Arsenic and Metals.

Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet, Ivan Nancucheo, Jérôme Jacob, Catherine Joulian

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabienne Battaglia-BrunetCNRS, BRGM, ISTO, UMR 7327, Université d'Orléans, Orleans, France. f.battaglia@brgm.fr.
Ivan NancucheoFacultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño, Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción, Chile.
Jérôme JacobBRGM, Orleans, France.
Catherine JoulianBRGM, Orleans, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human communities need water and mineral resources, the supply of which requires the implementation of recycling and saving strategies. Both closed and active mining sites could beneficiate of the implementation of nature-based solutions, including bioreactors involving sulphate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP), in order to separate and recover arsenic (As) and metals from aqueous stream while producing clean water. Selective precipitation strategies can be designed based on the selection of microbial communities adapted to the pH conditions, generally acidic, and to available low-cost electron donors. Laboratory batch and continuous experiments must be implemented for each type of mine water in order to determine the optimal flow-sheet in which As could be precipitated as sulphides (orpiment or realgar), inside the bioreactor or offline, through stripping of biologically produced hydrogen sulphides (H

Indexed as

ArsenicBioreactorsMetalsMiningWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationArsenicMetalsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcid mine waterArsenicBioremediationMetalsPrecipitationSulphate-reducing procaryotes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.