SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin labeling MR imaging in detecting cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The relation between cerebral arteriovenous malformations and heart diseases in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of arterial spin labeling MRI to identify residual cerebral arteriovenous malformations after treatment.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating post-treatment residual intracranial arteriovenous shunting: a comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI and digital subtraction angiography.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic accuracy of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is imperative for delineating management. The current standard is digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is an understudied noninvasive, non-contrast technique that allows angioarchitecture visualization and additionally quantifies cortical and AVM cerebral blood flow and hemodynamics. This meta-analysis aims to compare ASL and DSA imaging in detecting and characterizing cerebral AVMs. EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were queried from inception to July 2022 for reports of AVMs evaluated by DSA and ASL imaging. Fourteen studies with 278 patients evaluated using DSA and ASL imaging prior to intervention were included; pCASL in 11 studies (n = 239, 85.37%) and PASL in three studies (n = 41, 14.64%). The overall AVM detection rate on ASL was 99% (CI 97-100%); subgroup analysis revealed no difference between pCASL vs. PASL (99%; CI 96-100% vs. 100%; CI 95-100% respectively, p = 0.42). The correlation value comparing ASL and DSA nidus size was 0.99. DSA and ASL intermodality agreement Cohen's k factor for Spetzler Martin Grading (SMG) was reported at a median of 0.98 (IQR 0.73-0.1), with a 1.0 agreement on SMG classification. A median of 25 arteries were detected by DSA (IQR 14.5-27), vs. 25 by ASL (IQR 14.5-27.5) at a median 0.92 k factor. ASL provides angioarchitectural visualization noninferior to DSA and additionally quantifies CBF. Our study suggests that ASL should be considered in the detection of AVMs, especially in patients with contrast contraindications or apprehension towards an invasive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39190141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.