Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39190088›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024

Developing probabilistic ensemble machine learning models for home-based sleep apnea screening using overnight SpO2 data at varying data granularity.

Zilu Liang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zilu LiangUbiquitous and Personal Computing Lab, Kyoto University of Advanced Science (KUAS), 18 Yamanouchi Gotanda-cho, Ukyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan. liang.zilu@kuas.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2328-5016

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K17670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to develop sleep apnea screening models with overnight SpO2 data, and to investigate the impact of the SpO2 data granularity on model performance.

methodsA total of 7,718 SpO2 recordings from the SHHS and MESA datasets were used. Probabilistic ensemble machine learning was employed to predict sleep apnea status at three AHI cutoff points: ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 events/hour. To investigate the impact of data granularity, SpO2 data were aggregated at 30, 60, and 300 s.

resultsOur models demonstrated good to excellent performance on internal test, with average area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.91, 0.93, and 0.96 for cutoffs ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 at data granularity of 1 s, respectively. Both sensitivity (0.76, 0.84, 0.89) and specificity (0.87, 0.86, 0.90) ranged from good to excellent across three cutoffs. Positive predictive values (PPV) ranged from excellent to fair (0.97, 0.83, 0.66), and negative predictive values (NPV) ranged from low to excellent (0.43, 0.87, 0.98). Model performance on external test slightly dropped compared to internal test, but still achieved good to excellent AUC above 0.80 across all data granularity and all the three cutoffs. Data granularity of 300 s led to a reduction in performance metrics across all cutoffs.

conclusionOur models demonstrated superior performance across all three AHI cutoff thresholds compared to existing large sleep apnea screening models, even when considering varying SpO2 data granularity. However, lower data granularity was associated with decreased screening performance, indicating a need for further research in this area.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSleep Apnea SyndromesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalOximetryOxygen SaturationPolysomnographySleep Apnea, ObstructiveData granularityDecision boundaryEnsemble learningMachine learningOximeterProbabilistic learningSleep apneaSpO2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.