ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024
Astrocyte-Neuron Interactions in Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- M2 polarization of macrophages: Manipulation of spinal cord injury repair.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- The NO-cGMP signaling pathway and depression: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Exercise training promotes nerve cell repair and regeneration after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Mechanisms underpinning spontaneous spinal cord regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- SOX Genes in Spinal Cord Injury: Redefining Neural Stem Cell Regeneration Strategies.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injuries cause irreversible loss of sensory and motor functions. In mammals, intrinsic and extrinsic inhibitions of neuronal regeneration obstruct neural repair after spinal cord injury. Although astrocytes have been involved in a growing list of vital homeostatic functions in the nervous system, their roles after injury have fascinated and puzzled scientists for decades. Astrocytes undergo long-lasting morphological and functional changes after injury, referred to as reactive astrogliosis. Although reactive astrogliosis is required to contain spinal cord lesions and restore the blood-spinal cord barrier, reactive astrocytes have detrimental effects that inhibit neuronal repair and remyelination. Intriguingly, elevated regenerative capacity is preserved in some non-mammalian vertebrates, where astrocyte-like glial cells display exclusively pro-regenerative effects after injury. A detailed molecular and phenotypic catalog of the continuum of astrocyte reactivity states is an essential first step toward the development of glial cell manipulations for spinal cord repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.