ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2024
Single cell, Label free Characterisation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal cell Stemness and Future Growth Potential by Autofluorescence Multispectral Imaging.
Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic imaging for gamete and embryo assessment through advanced microscopy technologies: a novel avenue for artificial intelligence?Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Multidimensional data analysis and classification using SMIAL.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo use autofluorescence multispectral imaging (AFMI) to develop a non-invasive assay for the in-depth characterisation of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBM-MSCs).
methodshBM-MSCs were imaged by AFMI on gridded dishes, stained for endpoints of interest (STRO-1 positivity, alkaline phosphatase, beta galactosidase, DNA content) then relocated and results correlated. Intensity, texture and morphological features were used to characterise the colour distribution of regions of interest, and canonical discriminant analysis was used to separate groups. Additionally, hBM-MSC lines were cultured to arrest, with AFMI images taken after each passage to investigate whether an assay could be developed for growth potential.
resultsSTRO-1 positivity could be predicted with a receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67. For spontaneous differentiation this was 0.66, for entry to the cell-cycle it was 0.77 and for senescence it was 0.77. Growth potential (population doublings remaining) was estimated with an RMSPE = 2.296. The Mean Absolute Error of the final prediction model indicated that growth potential could be predicted with an error of ± 1.86 doublings remaining.
conclusionsThis non-invasive methodology enabled the in-depth characterisation of hBM-MSCs from a single assay. This approach is advantageous for clinical applications as well as research and stands out for the characterisation of both present status as well as future behaviour. The use of data from five MSC lines with heterogenous AFMI profiles supports potential generalisability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.