Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39189760›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2024

Comparison and evaluation of neutralization of clinically frequently used antimicrobial agents using three different culture media in simulated blood cultures.

Yaping Hang, Jianqiu Xiong, Longhua Hu, Yanhui Chen, Shan Zou, Xueyao Fang, Yanping Xiao, Xingwei Cao, Hong Lou, Xiuzhen Li and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yaping Hang *Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-9738
Jianqiu Xiong *Intravenous Medication Dispensing Center, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Longhua HuJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yanhui ChenJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Shan ZouJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xueyao FangJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yanping XiaoJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xingwei CaoJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Hong LouJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiuzhen LiJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-4640
Yanhua LiuJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qiaoshi ZhongJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1851-9682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of BACT/ALERT FA/FN Plus (France) blood culture containing a novel resin, DL (China) blood culture containing common resin, and adsorbent-free REDOX (USA) blood culture relying on dilution for antimicrobial neutralization at %peak serum concentration was evaluated by measuring the recovery of organisms and time to detection (TTD) in nine simulated microorganism-antimicrobial combination blood cultures. Significant differences were observed in the recovery rates among the aerobic media: 87.5% for BACT/ALERT media, 42.9% for DL media, and 12.5% for REDOX media. In contrast, no statistical difference was found in the TTD between FA Plus media and DL aerobic media. For the anaerobic media, the recovery rates were 91.4% for BACT/ALERT media, 2.9% for DL media, and 14.3% for REDOX media, with significant differences only between BACT/ALERT FN Plus media and the others. Among the seven main antimicrobial categories, only BACT/ALERT FA/FN Plus culture media demonstrated high recovery of microorganisms, with the exception of carbapenems. The DL culture media exhibited a relatively high recovery rate of microorganisms in the presence of piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and gentamicin, but only in aerobic conditions. Conversely, REDOX media displayed microorganism recovery solely in the presence of gentamicin. BACT/ALERT FA/FN Plus culture media with novel resin showed absolute advantages over DL and REDOX culture media and can, therefore, be selectively applied in clinical settings when antimicrobials are used prior to blood collection. DL culture media, containing common resin, outperformed adsorbent-free dilution-based REDOX culture media, making it a viable backup option. There is a need to focus on improving the neutralization of carbapenems with current inefficiency in all three medias. IMPORTANCE: We present a study on performance comparison of three different commercial culture media for neutralization of antibiotic effects in simulated blood cultures. BACT/ALERT (FA Plus and FN Plus) culture media with novel resin showed absolute advantages over DL and REDOX culture media at %PSL concentration of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

Blood CultureCulture MediaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCulture Mediaaerobicanaerobicantimicrobial neutralizationBACT/ALERT plus mediablood cultureDL mediarecovery rateREDOX media

Identifiers

PMID39189760
PMCPMC11448418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.