ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2024
Correlations of spinopelvic parameters with quality of life of patients with adult degenerative scoliosis after posterior correction.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Angle May Estimate Pelvic Tilt in Patients with Severe Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Leg Length Discrepancy Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Article
- Simultaneous prone transpsoas interbody fusion and osteotomies for severe deformity correction: multi-institutional retrospective review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Spinopelvic alignment and sagittal gait kinematics of adult patients with cerebral palsy.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Application of deformity principles in the management of spinal neoplasms: A Primer.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Expression of lipid metabolism and cartilage degeneration-related factors in lumbar vertebral endplate Modic changes.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the correlations of spinopelvic parameters with the quality of life of patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) after posterior correction, and their relationships with efficacy Patients and methods: Ninety patients (40 females, 50 males; mean age: 62.4±3.3 years; range, 47 to 73 years) with adult spinal deformity treated from March 2016 to May 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire was filled in by the patients, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and lower limb pain were assessed. All the patients underwent posterior correction. Spearman's analysis was conducted for the correlations of the spinopelvic sagittal parameters with quality of life. The risk factors for efficacy were identified using the multivariate logistic regression model to construct a nomogram model for efficacy and risk prediction.
resultsAfter the operation, significant reductions were detected in the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and the ODI score (p<0.05). The SVA and LL were significantly negatively correlated with all subitems on the SRS-22 questionnaire but positively correlated with VAS scores for back pain (p<0.05). Thoracic kyphosis was significantly positively correlated with self-image and mental status on the SRS-22 questionnaire (p<0.05), while TPA was negatively correlated with pain and self-image (p<0.05). The PI-LL was significantly negatively correlated with pain (p<0.05).
conclusionThe SVA, LL, PT, and PI-LL were independent predictors of improvement in ODI after operation for ADS. The postoperative changes in spinopelvic parameters affected the clinical outcomes in patients with ADS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.