ArticleJournal of proteome research2024
Missing Values in Longitudinal Proteome Dynamics Studies: Making a Case for Data Multiple Imputation.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The good, the bad, and the ugly: opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in spatial proteomics modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Leucine Attenuates Osteoarthritis via mTORC1/LXRα-Mediated Macrophage Reprogramming and Rspo2/β-Catenin Axis Suppression.Cartilage · 2025Article
- Short and long-term effects on the thyroid proteome after 131I exposure.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal proteomics data sets are often confounded by the challenges of missing values. These missing data points, in a time-series context, can lead to fluctuations in measurements or the omission of critical events, thus hindering the ability to fully comprehend the underlying biomedical processes. We introduce a Data Multiple Imputation (DMI) pipeline designed to address this challenge in temporal data set turnover rate quantifications, enabling robust downstream analysis to gain novel discoveries. To demonstrate its utility and generalizability, we applied this pipeline to two use cases: a murine cardiac temporal proteomics data set and a human plasma temporal proteomics data set, both aimed at examining protein turnover rates. This DMI pipeline significantly enhanced the detection of protein turnover rate in both data sets, and furthermore, the imputed data sets captured new representation of proteins, leading to an augmented view of biological pathways, protein complex dynamics, as well as biomarker-disease associations. Importantly, DMI exhibited superior performance in benchmark data sets compared to single imputation methods (DSI). In summary, we have demonstrated that this DMI pipeline is effective at overcoming challenges introduced by missing values in temporal proteome dynamics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.