ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the understanding of tumor microenvironment through medical imaging based on bibliometric analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Linking tumor viability and immune infiltration with dual-nucleus MRI in preclinical models.Npj imaging · 2026Article
- Multinuclear NMR and MRI Beyond Proton Imaging: Principles, Contrast Mechanisms, and Applications in Materials and Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. Targeting Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) mutation and its related pathways may enhance immunotherapy efficacy. While in vivo monitoring of therapeutic response and immune cell migration remains challenging, Fluorine-19 MRI ( PURPOSE: Evaluating the potential of STUDY TYPE: Pre-clinical animal study. ANIMAL MODEL: Murine genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model (N = 20, both sexes). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 9.4-T, two-dimensional multi-slice Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement sequence. Intravenous injection of ASSESSMENT: Upon tumor detection by conventional STATISTICAL TESTS: Independent t-tests and one-way analysis of variance.
resultsDATA
conclusionEVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.