ArticlePediatric pulmonology2024
A multicenter epidemiological survey of iNO use in preterm infants in China.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multicenter epidemiological survey of iNO use in preterm infants in China.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in hospitalized preterm infants in China over 10 years and its clinical outcomes.
methodsA total of 616 premature infants who were administered iNO in the Neonatology Departments of 5 Class A tertiary hospitals in China for ten years from January 2013 to December 2022 were included retrospectively. Based on their enrollment periods, the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 from January 2013 to December 2017 and Group 2 from January 2018 to December 2022, respectively. The perinatal characteristics, short-term clinical outcomes, and mortality rates were compared between these two groups.
resultsThe utilization of iNO in preterm infants grew annually over the past10 years; the utilization of iNO in Group 2 infants increased approximately one-fold when compared with Group 1 (1.52% vs. 0.80%, p < .001), and the increase was greater in gestational age (GA) < 34 weeks compared with 34-36 weeks preterm infants. Moreover, the iNO usage in Group 1 infants with GA < 34 weeks increased from 1.14% to 2.46% and 0.60% to 0.99% in 34-36 weeks preterm infants (p < .001) in Group 2, respectively. Apart from a smaller GA (32.9 w vs. 33.5 w, p < .001) and birth weight (BW, 1900 g vs. 2141 g, p < .001), the initial [14 parts per million (ppm) versus 10 ppm, p < .001] and maximum (15 ppm vs. 10 ppm, p < .001) doses of Group 2 were larger; however, their recent clinical outcomes did not improve with increasing iNO utilization (p > .05)as compared to Group 1, respectively. Although the overall iNO preterm mortality rates over the past 10 years were 25.8%, the mortality rates for preterm infants at 34-36 weeks were significantly lower than for preterm infants at GA < 34 weeks (15.4% vs. 33.8%, p < .001). Nonetheless, no improvement in mortality was observed in Group 2 preterm infants with GA < 34 weeks for the past 5 years when compared with Group 1 (32.9% vs. 35.8%, p > .05) infants, and significantly lower mortality rates were noticed in preterm infants with 34-36 weeks (11.2% vs. 22.7%, p < .001). Patients with hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) or persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) iNO preterm infants did not show lower mortality rates with the increase of iNO use rate (p > .05). The overall mortality rates of preterm PPHN infants with iNO were lower than that of HRF (20.2% vs. 36.5%, p < .001), while the mortality rates of Group 2 preterm PPHN infants with iNO significantly lower than that of HRF (17.7% vs 36.0%, p < .001).
conclusionThe iNO has been extensively used in Chinese preterm infants over the past 10 years, this increase was more significant in preterm infants with GA < 34 weeks. Moreover, preterm infants using iNO have lower GA and BW, larger initial and maximum doses, and more aggressive strategies in the last past 5 years. Although iNO use in preterm infants with GA of 34-36 weeks has significantly reduced mortality, mortality rates and short-term clinical outcomes of iNO in preterm infants <34 weeks of GA has no obvious improvement. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of iNO in preterm infants <34 weeks of GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.