ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024
Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Variations in Practice and Early Management of Infants with Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the United States.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Addressing the Global Disparities in Access to Treatment in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy: Updated real-world practical considerations.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Nusinersen for type-III spinal muscular atrophy: a 12-month retrospective study in a Brazilian cohort.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Clinical Experience of Timing Treatment in Newborns with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Call for Standardized Screening Practices in Italy.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Trends in the Timeliness of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Detection in US Infants, 2016-2023.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Treating Presymptomatic Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patients with Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Italy: The Role of the National Health System and Drug Supply. Comment on Zaidman et al. Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Variations in Practice and Early Management of Infants with Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the United States.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Current clinical applications of AAV-mediated gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Total Intramuscular Fat Fraction of Thigh Muscles as a Predictor of Nusinersen Efficacy in Pediatric SMA Type II and III.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An induced pluripotent stem cell-based chemical genetic approach for studying spinal muscular atrophy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Newborn Screening by DNA-First: Systematic Evaluation of the Eligibility of Inherited Metabolic Disorders Based on Treatability.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Article
- Genomic newborn screening in India: Opportunities, evidence, and roadmap.Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States (U.S.), newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is implemented by individual states. There is likely variation in the practice patterns of state NBS programs and among the providers caring for newborns with SMA. This is a prospective, descriptive, observational study that seeks to quantify and describe practice patterns and heterogeneities in state NBS programs and provider practices in the U.S. We surveyed U.S. state NBS programs and care providers of newborns with SMA. Thirty states and 41 practitioners responded. NBS program practices vary by state. Most (74%) state programs provide results to both primary care and specialist providers and also defer confirmatory SMA testing to those providers. Two states had relatively high rates of false-positive or inclusive results. The total birth prevalence of SMA was 1:13,862. Most providers were in tertiary care centers (90%) and were child neurologists (81%) and/or had fellowship training in Neuromuscular Medicine or Electromyography (76%). All providers see new referrals in less than a week, but many do not initiate treatment until >3 weeks of age (39%), with most commonly reported delays related to insurance processes. Most (81%) prefer onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (OA) as the treatment of choice, mainly due to perceived efficacy and the route/frequency of administration. NBS practice patterns in the U.S. vary by state but overall yielded the predicted birth prevalence of positive results. Providers evaluate these newborns urgently, but many do not initiate therapy until after 3 weeks of age. Treatment delays are mainly related to insurance processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.