Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39189227›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024

Continuity of Operations in Newborn Screening: Lessons Learned from Three Incidents.

M Christine Dorley, Elizabeth Bair, Patricia Ryland, Amanda D Ingram, Emily Reeves, Kara J Levinson, Ona O Adair, Jenny F Meredith, Susanne Crowe

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M Christine DorleyDivision of Laboratory Services, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN 37216, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7924-8521
Elizabeth BairPublic Health Laboratory, South Carolina Department of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29223, USA.
Patricia RylandFlorida Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Jacksonville, FL 32202, USA.
Amanda D IngramDivision of Family Health and Wellness, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN 37216, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-7777
Emily ReevesFlorida Newborn Screening Follow-Up Program, Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA.
Kara J LevinsonDivision of Laboratory Services, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN 37216, USA.
Ona O AdairPublic Health Laboratory, South Carolina Department of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29223, USA.
Jenny F MeredithPublic Health Laboratory, South Carolina Department of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29223, USA.
Susanne CroweFlorida Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Jacksonville, FL 32202, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-5642-8857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three incidents that impacted two US newborn screening (NBS) programs highlight the importance of contingency planning for the continuity of operations (COOP). Other NBS programs may benefit from the experience of these state programs for their own contingency planning efforts. Through after-action reviews conducted post-incident, crucial elements for the successful management of an incident were identified. We detailed the strengths, weaknesses, improvements needed, and future actions that will assist in preparing for other incidents as lessons learned.

Indexed as

contingency planningcontinuity of operationsdisasteremergency preparednessincidentnewborn screening

Identifiers

PMID39189227
PMCPMC11348246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.