Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39189185›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Computerized Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test: Normative Data for School-Aged Children.

Daniela Protasevica, Evita Kassaliete, Anete Klavinska, Madara Alecka, Asnate Berzina, Viktorija Goliskina, Marija Koleda, Rita Mikelsone, Elizabete Ozola, Tomass Ruza and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Daniela ProtasevicaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Evita KassalieteDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-2331-8551
Anete KlavinskaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Madara AleckaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Asnate BerzinaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Viktorija GoliskinaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Marija KoledaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Rita MikelsoneDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Elizabete OzolaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Tomass RuzaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Evita SerpaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-9083
Aiga SvedeDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-4282
Daniela TolokaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Sofija VasiljevaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Liva VolbergaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Ilze CepleDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9396-3628
Gunta KruminaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-5726-3819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the normative data of the computerized DEM test for school-age children in Latvia. The study analyzed data on the performance (test execution time, duration, number of fixations, and number of errors) of 291 children while completing the computerized DEM test. Eye movement fixations were recorded with a Tobii Pro Fusion video-oculograph (250 Hz). According to the results of the study, the performance of the computerized DEM test is 77 %. For the study, 1 SD (one standard deviation) was chosen as a criterion for determining test norms. In the study, the norms of the computerized DEM test in Latvia were developed in class groups-from 1st to 6th grade (aged 7 to 12 years), the results were summarized in a table as the minimum performance values of the computerized DEM test.

Indexed as

DEM testfixationsreading disordersschool-aged children

Identifiers

PMID39189185
PMCPMC11348016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.