ArticleVaccine: X2024
Development of multidose thermotolerant formulations of a vector-based Covid-19 vaccine candidate, NDV-HXP-S in different product formats: Stability and preservative efficacy study.
Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Characterization of a Thermostable Liquid Formulation of Live Newcastle Disease Vaccine.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current lead coronavirus vaccines require continuous cold or ultra-cold storage from the manufacturing site to the field to maintain protective efficacy. Since cold chain capacity is limited and complex, logistics planning is crucial to limit vaccine wastage.[1] The restrictive storage concerns also make it difficult to share vaccines between public health departments and neighboring states, leading to increased vaccine wastage.[2] A Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) vector-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) vaccine candidate, NDV-HXP-S, offers a cost-effective alternative which aims to improve global access to SARS CoV-2 vaccines.[3] The NDV-HXP-S vaccine candidate can be mass-produced in chicken eggs and has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical studies, as well as acceptable safety and potent immunogenicity in clinical studies.[3,4-10] To further advance the NDV-HXP-S vaccine candidate, this manuscript describes work focused on the development of multidose thermotolerant vaccine formulations (i.e., those which would not require continuous extended refrigeration), making it convenient to use and store, and simplifying transport and distribution logistics, especially in outbreak settings. Liquid and lyophilized formulations for parenteral administration were rigorously screened for the vaccine formulation's ability to maintain S-antigen stability after exposure to temperature stress at 40 °C, 25 °C, and 2 °C to 8 °C storage for six months. Preservative efficacy was evaluated to enable a multidose liquid vaccine format as well as endotoxin testing in lyophilized formulations. Lead liquid vaccine formations were identified that were able to maintain S-antigen content at 2 °C to 8 °C and 25 °C storage for the entire six-month study. Lead lyophilized vaccine formulations were identified which were able to maintain S-antigen content for six months at 2 °C to 8 °C, 25 °C, and 40 °C. Both the liquid and lyophilized formulations identified are improved thermotolerant SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.