ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Differences in Treatment Patterns and Patient Characteristics Between COVID-19 Patients Treated with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Ensitrelvir in Japan.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-r) and ensitrelvir (ESV) are similar protease inhibitors that act against 3C-like protease (3CL protease) which is related the viral replication of SARS-CoV-2, and are recommended as oral treatment for COVID-19 patients in the guidance. However, NMV-r was approved in 2022 for the treatment of patients who are at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19 based on the clinical trial data during severe original strain period, whereas ESV was approved in 2023 for the treatment of non-risk patients based on the clinical trial data during mild Omicron strain period in Japan. In this study, we investigated the differences in treatment patterns and patient characteristics between COVID-19 patients treated with NMV-r and ESV. NMV-r has usually been used for elderly patients with malignant tumors in the hospital, whereas ESV has been used for younger patients in the outpatient clinic as the common practice. It has been suggested that NMV-r and ESV have been used differently in Japan because there might be gaps in the implementation periods and the evidence from clinical trials. We should use each oral agent appropriately and make different recommendations in the guidance in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.