Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39189005›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Differences in Treatment Patterns and Patient Characteristics Between COVID-19 Patients Treated with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Ensitrelvir in Japan.

Masafumi Seki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masafumi SekiDivision of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka City, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5414-8148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-r) and ensitrelvir (ESV) are similar protease inhibitors that act against 3C-like protease (3CL protease) which is related the viral replication of SARS-CoV-2, and are recommended as oral treatment for COVID-19 patients in the guidance. However, NMV-r was approved in 2022 for the treatment of patients who are at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19 based on the clinical trial data during severe original strain period, whereas ESV was approved in 2023 for the treatment of non-risk patients based on the clinical trial data during mild Omicron strain period in Japan. In this study, we investigated the differences in treatment patterns and patient characteristics between COVID-19 patients treated with NMV-r and ESV. NMV-r has usually been used for elderly patients with malignant tumors in the hospital, whereas ESV has been used for younger patients in the outpatient clinic as the common practice. It has been suggested that NMV-r and ESV have been used differently in Japan because there might be gaps in the implementation periods and the evidence from clinical trials. We should use each oral agent appropriately and make different recommendations in the guidance in the near future.

Indexed as

3C-like proteasecytochrome P450guidanceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39189005
PMCPMC11345459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.