ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Prospective Randomized Study on the Use of Sentinel Node Biopsy for High-risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Factors of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Technetium-99m-marked sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma as a safe and effective procedure for patient and staff.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is not yet clearly documented, especially for the head and neck area, due to its rich and cross-branching lymphatic system. We present the first prospective randomized study on the use of SLNB in high-risk CSCCs of the head and neck. Methods: Seventy-six patients with high-risk CSCCs of the head and neck were randomly divided into two groups: A (n = 38) and B (n = 38). In group A, SLNB was performed additionally to the excision of squamous cell carcinoma, whereas in group B, only excision of the lesion was performed. The patients were followed up for 5 years postoperatively, and local recurrences, regional metastases (regional lymph nodes), and mortality were documented. Results: One patient of group A, who never attended any follow-up, was excluded. Both groups had similar characteristics regarding Breslow thickness, perineurial invasion, peripheral limits, differentiation, size, previous incomplete excision, age, sex, education, sun exposure, Fitzpatrick score, previous incomplete excision, previous skin cancer, and smoking. Two patients had a positive sentinel lymph node and were submitted to regional lymphadenectomy. We documented deaths (three in group A and two in group B; Conclusion: There is no clear benefit on the use of SLNB in high-risk CSCCs of the head and neck regarding metastasis, mortality, or local recurrence control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.