Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188961›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Abdominal Mesh Use in Pedicled Rectus Abdominis Flaps for Pelvic Reconstruction.

Laura L Barnes, Michael C Holland, Rachel Lentz, Jacquelyn A Knox, Hani Sbitany, Merisa Piper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura L BarnesFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Michael C HollandFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Rachel LentzDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Jacquelyn A KnoxFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Hani SbitanyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, N.Y.
Merisa PiperFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rectus abdominis flap coverage of high-risk perineal wounds following extirpative pelvic procedures can result in improved perineal outcomes. However, rectus abdominis flap harvest has morbidity associated with the donor site, including hernia or bulge development. The risk-benefit profile of mesh use in this scenario is not well-defined in the literature. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent rectus abdominis flap coverage of pelvic defects at our institution during July 2012-January 2021. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether mesh was used and whether primary fascial closure was achieved. Donor site outcomes were analyzed between groups. Results: One hundred consecutive patients were included. When considering all patients in whom primary fascial closure was achieved, the use of mesh did not significantly decrease rates of hernia development. Mesh use in this setting was associated with significantly greater rates of infection, requiring procedural intervention (12% versus 0%, Conclusions: When closing a pedicled rectus abdominis flap donor site, if primary fascial closure is achievable, the addition of mesh to reinforce the repair does not have an added benefit. Mesh use in this setting was not shown to prevent hernia or bulge development, and was found to be associated with significantly greater rates of infection, requiring procedural intervention.

Identifiers

PMID39188961
PMCPMC11346840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.