ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Interplay of physical and recognition performance using hierarchical continuous-time dynamic modeling and a dual-task training regime in Alzheimer's patients.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025Article
- Longitudinal evidence for a mutually reinforcing relationship between white matter hyperintensities and cortical thickness in cognitively unimpaired older adults.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Article
- Interplay of physical and recognition performance using hierarchical continuous-time dynamic modeling and a dual-task training regime in Alzheimer's patients.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Bayesian analyses for research on Alzheimer's disease and related disorders-updating one's knowledge.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training studies typically investigate the cumulative rather than the analytically challenging immediate effect of exercise on cognitive outcomes. We investigated the dynamic interplay between single-session exercise intensity and time-locked recognition speed-accuracy scores in older adults with Alzheimer's dementia ( Highlights: Hierarchical Bayesian continuous-time dynamic modeling approachA total of 72 repeated physical exercise (PP) and integrated recognition speed-accuracy (IRSA) measurementsPP is dynamically linked to session-to-session variability of IRSAHigher PP improved IRSA in subsequent sessions in subjects with Alzheimer's dementiaShort-term effect: lasting up to 4 days after training session.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.