ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Quality of life in oncological patients with venous thromboembolic disease.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient Satisfaction with Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: A Systematic Review of Oral and Parenteral Regiments.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Venous Thromboembolism Management and Anticoagulation Opportunities in Cancer Patients.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Implementation failure: thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Risk assessment and prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with solid malignancies.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a significant medical problem in cancer patients, as it is associated with substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Cancer survivors with VTE experience important changes in their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Over the past few years, HRQOL and its measurement have been incorporated in clinical studies of anticoagulation therapy, as well as in qualitative and quantitative studies for the examination of the impact of VTE in cancer patients. While there are several tools available to assess HRQOL, few are specific to cancer patients and VTE. More importantly, those same tools are yet to be incorporated in routine clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to describe the available tools for the assessment of HRQOL in cancer patients with a focus on VTE, as well as the characteristics of those tools, their strengths, limitations, and potential applicability in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.