Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188884›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Erythrocytosis in congenital heart defects: hints for diagnosis and therapy from a clinical case.

Oscar Borsani, Marzia Varettoni, Giacomo Riccaboni, Elisa Rumi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oscar BorsaniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Marzia VarettoniDepartment of Hematology, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giacomo RiccaboniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Elisa RumiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erythrocytosis is one of the most common abnormalities that clinical hematologists, general practitioners, and internal medicine specialists could have to face off in their routine clinical practice. While diagnostic criteria for primary erythrocytosis (i.e., polycythemia vera) are well known and characterized, there are several causes of secondary erythrocytosis that should be kept in mind to avoid misdiagnosis. Congenital heart defects are rarely cause of secondary erythrocytosis as they are normally recognized and treated at an early stage. Eisenmenger syndrome is a complex clinical syndrome that arise as consequence of an untreated congenital heart defect associated with large intracardiac shunt. The clinical picture of this syndrome usually includes a severe erythrocytosis that could tempt clinicians to start an intensive phlebotomy (or venesection) program. However, clinicians should be aware that erythrocytosis in Eisenmenger syndrome is a compensatory mechanism aimed at improving blood oxygen-carrying capacity; accordingly, phlebotomies should be reserved for those cases complaining hyperviscosity symptoms. Here we present a case of an adult female patient with Eisenmenger syndrome that has been evaluated because of severe and persistent erythrocytosis. In this case we present a step-by-step approach by which clinical hematologist could proceed to reach the definitive diagnosis. We will also provide some hints that could help clinicians when choosing the best treatment strategy to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful procedures.

Indexed as

congenitalEisenmengererythrocytosisheartsyndrome

Identifiers

PMID39188884
PMCPMC11345742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.