ArticleMaedica2024
A Pilot and Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Add-On Therapy to Remdesivir in Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis placebo-controlled and randomized pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and impact of tofacitinib/remdesivir combination therapy compared to remdesivir alone on clinical and laboratory findings of severely ill COVID-19 patients for future large-scale studies.
methodFifty patients were included in this study. They were randomly allocated into two groups of 25 subjects each. Patients in the treatment group received a five-day course of tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) in addition to a five-day course of remdesivir, whereas the control group received a 10-day course of remdesivir with a placebo.
resultsThere was no significant difference in rates of need for intubation (oxygen saturation level), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, death and length of hospitalization between the two groups (P>0.05). Nevertheless, the PRIEST severity score was significantly reduced in the treatment group compared to the control group (P=0.03, effect size [95% CI]: -0.616 [0.0233-1.1723]). Moreover, the mean level of C-reactive protein after 10 days was significantly decreased in the treatment group but increased in the control group (P=0.006).
conclusionTofacitinib adopted in this pilot study modulate the inflammation and reduce the PRIEST score in severe COVID-19 patients. So, it is feasible and could be applied in future larger-scale trials to precisely determine its effects on coronavirus infections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.