ArticleMaedica2024
Effect of Physiotherapy on Preterm Neonates and its Results on Five-Year-Old Children, According to GMFM - GMPM Evaluation Scales.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-hospital motor interventions to reduce neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: a scoping review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to emphasize the necessity and possibilities of early intervention and physiotherapy rehabilitation of premature infants, as they are reflected in five-year olds according to the gross motor function measure (GMFM) and gross motor performance measure (GMPM) evaluation scales for gross function and quality of movement. In addition, the present study examined the importance of using assessment tools for children who have received or not therapeutic intervention, through which both the child's abilities and appropriateness of the help received by him/her are evaluated based on individual needs. MATERIAL AND
methodsOur specific exploratory process was carried out through a literature review as well as a process of primary research, in order to obtain and collect all necessary information and data which would finally lead us to the nearest and best conclusions. Our goal was to collect 20 complete and graded GMFM and 20 GMPM assessment tests, so that our research was based on a satisfactory sample of participants. In the next year, the scores received by participants were recorded and analyzed using the statistical software program SPSS (Superior Performance Software System). The analysis was performed through descriptive and inductive statistical analysis in the SPSS statistical program. Specifically, the SPSS version 20.0 and specifically the one-way ANOVA variance analysis and the Tukey's parametric test were used for the statistical analysis of the results.
resultsThe use of physiotherapy care was found to be important for premature infants, as the level of statistical significance was set at p <0.05, while the data were reported as average. The final overall scores of the evaluations (on average) were higher in the group who received early intervention and specialized physiotherapy intervention from the first day after birth.
conclusionsThe effect of physiotherapy on premature infants is positive in five-year-old children, who have completed almost all their developmental stages at that age. These benefits become apparent not only in a better handling of kinetic patterns and sequences but also in the ability to execute kinetic models, conquer developmental motor stages and perform them with quality in terms of alignment, sequence, synergy of movements, separation and stability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.