ReviewMaedica2024
Tocophobia: Risk Factors, Consequences and Management - A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Review in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs far as childbirth is concerned, it is well known that it constitutes a major life process for every woman. Many women experience negative emotions during pregnancy because of the normal hormonal changes. However, if fear becomes severe, it gives rise to a specific pathology termed tocophobia. Especially, tocophobia adversely affects women's pregnancy and childbirth, including increased caesarean sections. Consequently, midwives need to detect women with tocophobia in order to support them. The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze the risk factors for tocophobia, the impact of this health condition on caesarean sections and the midwife's role. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present systematic review comprised 32 full-text cross-sectional, qualitative, experimental studies and cohort studies published in English between 2017 and 2022, that were obtained from PubMed and Google Scholar databases, and it was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline.
resultsThe present analysis found that sociodemographic, obstetric and psychological factors were associated with tocophobia. Moreover, women with severe fear had increased obstetric interventions, particularly caesarean sections. Studies have also shown that psycho-education, preparation classes and specific counselling by trained midwives are effective methods in reducing tocophobia.
conclusionsMidwives should be aware of the risk factors for tocophobia in order to detect women with fears and support them in the attempt to avoid non-urgent obstetric interventions. Antenatal and intrapartum care should be offered to women with tocophobia to reduce their fear as well as the prevalence of caesarean section and to promote vaginal birth with a positive experience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.