ArticleMaedica2024
Comparative Evaluation of Pulmonary Function in Male Street Vendors Versus Smokers: Insights into Occupational and Lifestyle Impact.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational and lifestyle factors, such as smoking and street vending, may pose risks to pulmonary health. Previous studies explored the effect of both smoking and exposure to street pollutants on health. However, a study comparing the pulmonary functions of street vendors (who do not smoke) and smokers has not been conducted before.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the pulmonary function parameters among three groups consisting of smokers, street vendors and controls in order to discern potential differences in respiratory health between the three groups.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in the Deoghar district of the Jharkhand state, in India, over a period of five months (between January 2023 and May 2023). A total of 90 male participants, including 30 smokers, 30 street vendors and 30 age-matched control research participants, underwent pulmonary function testing (forced spirometry) using standardized methods. The comparison among the three groups was conducted by one-way analysis of variance with the post-hoc test.
resultsA total of 30 controls with a mean age of 33.77±6.01 years, street vendors with a mean age of 32.93±6.29 years and smokers with a mean age of 32.27±7.86 years participated in the present study. There was an average exposure to road pollutants for 13.47±9.48 years and smoking for 13.23±8.29 years (P=0.92). Lung function parameters, except for the forced expiratory volume in one second divided by the forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), were lower in street vendors and smokers than controls.
conclusionStreet vendors in Deoghar, Jharkhand, have lung function parameters comparable to smokers. Hence, although they are not smoking tobacco, their lung health is at risk. Hence, early interventions are required to protect them from pollutants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.