ArticleMaedica2024
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Friend or Foe.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMost breast cancers require neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the response to primary systemic therapy (PST) is crucial for deciding on the surgical technique and predicting patient outcomes. However, chemotherapy also brings numerous side effects, with cardiovascular issues being some of the most significant, common and challenging to manage. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 71-year-old woman diagnosed with stage T2N1M0 Luminal B breast cancer. It was decided to initiate chemotherapy consisting of four cycles of FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, epirubicin 60 mg-90 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m²), followed by four cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m² every three weeks). Near the end of the treatment cycles, she developed new-onset angina with complex critical coronary lesions. This required assembling a multidisciplinary team to determine the optimal management strategy from cardiological, surgical, and oncological standpoints. Just when we thought we had found the optimal approach for managing ischemic heart disease, the situation became more complicated with the development of deep vein thrombosis, requiring a reassessment of the entire treatment plan.
conclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important weapon against breast cancer but also a veritable enemy of cardiovascular diseases. The association of two major diseases requires a multidisciplinary team capable of making the best decisions to maximize benefits and minimize adverse effects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.