ArticleMaedica2024
The Outcome after Surgical Management of Ruptured Versus Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perforator-Aware Explainable Microsurgical Intelligence for Basilar Trunk Aneurysm Reconstruction: A Human-Centred Clinical AI Framework for Precision Neurovascular Surgery-A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Pre- and Post-treatment of Idebenone on the Side Effects of the Chemotherapy Model with Cyclophosphamide in the Rat Ovary.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe present article aimed to review the safety and the clinical and radiological outcomes of clipped ruptured and unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study investigated the relative articles involving the outcome after surgical management of ruptures versus unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms through electronic databases from January 1980 to January 2023. The primary outcomes were mortality and modified Rankin scale (mRS) >3.
resultsInformation on mRS >3 was found in six articles totalizing 2096 patients, of whom 130 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Data about mortality was provided by eight studies totalizing 2454 participants, of whom 140 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.
conclusionsThe current meta-analysis indicates that surgical clipping is a safe procedure for both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of anterior circulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.