ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2024
Sagittal spinal alignment measurements and evaluation: Historical perspective.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pelvic morphology decoupling from lumbar lordosis in chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis between mono-axial and poly-axial screws and their effect on rod and spine curvature mismatch in treatment of adult spinal deformity.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of spinal sagittal balance, spinal bone mineral density, and pulmonary function in severe ankylosing spondylitis using quantitative computed tomography.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Utility of the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA) for assessment of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine following short segment fusion: Comparison to segmental measures.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Influence of spine biomechanics and sagittal balance on the outcome of lumbar discectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal alignment analysis play an important role in evaluating patients and planning surgical corrections for adult spinal deformity. The history of these parameters is relatively short with the first parameter, the Cobb angle, introduced in 1948 as part of an effort to improve scoliosis evaluation. New developments in the field were limited for nearly 30 years before better imaging technology encouraged new theories and later data about spinal alignment and the relationship between the spine and pelvis. These efforts would ultimately contribute to the creation of foundational spinal alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. By the 1990s, spinal alignment had become a sustained area of investigation for spinal surgeons and researchers. Novel alignment parameters have since been introduced as our knowledge has evolved and has allowed for valuable research that demonstrates the clinical and surgical value of alignment measurement. This manuscript will explore the history of spinal alignment analysis over the decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.